Comments on: Chicago Sun-Times says Whites and Asians can’t be hate crime victims

By: Craig Salek

Craig Salek — Mon, 18 Jun 2012 03:47:00 +0000

Shouldn’t any crime that involves violence against one person from another person be a hate crime. The fact that anyone would do that to another human being seems pretty hateful regardless of the skin color or race of the victim and attacker. This is just a way to divide the races even more.

By: Mike Kent

Mike Kent — Sat, 16 Jun 2012 20:49:00 +0000

If this epidemic of mass assault on non-Blacks by Black “teens” is generated solely on lack of jobs and bad parenting, then shouldn’t we have mass assaults by deprived White and Hispanic “teens” against non-Whites/non-Hispanics? The stupidity of the argument is as blind as stating there “is no racial hatred” to the epidemic!
The problem is that the media/gov. directly promote and agitate aggression against Whites by Blacks.
Any place I’ve worked or went to school, whether factory, retail, or customer service Blacks are permitted to be lazy, rude, and downright abusive to Whites. And, with government laws and media propaganda the supervisors are scared to enforce equal respect and work ethics simply for fear of law suites and/or being called (god forbid) “Raaacist”.

By: 4teepee

4teepee — Sat, 16 Jun 2012 02:15:00 +0000

According to the SPLC’s own standards, assuming that Whites and Asians have the best things to steal would qualify as racist stereotyping. The SPLC sure is confused.

By: Earl P. Holt III

Earl P. Holt III — Fri, 15 Jun 2012 20:17:00 +0000

That’s interesting about the different approaches of black versus white “reporters.” Even Bernie Goldberg didn’t mention such a phenomenon in his book, “Bias.”

By: haroldcrews

haroldcrews — Fri, 15 Jun 2012 19:02:00 +0000

I’m guessing that she meant that Asians couldn’t be the victim of a hate crime by blacks. Obviously it goes without saying that Asians can be a hate crime victim of whites. It’s just part of that white privilege.

By: Kyle Rogers

Kyle Rogers — Fri, 15 Jun 2012 18:16:00 +0000

I have done numerous media interviews over the years and have been treated better by black reporters than white reporters. In my experience black reporters tend to think of themselves as doing a job, while white newspaper reporters feel they are on a quasi-religious mission to “educate” the public. There is a segment of white reporters who are just absolutely malicious and in no way shape or form even pretend to be fair or present both side. Others are less extreme. They’ll have ten paragraphs of quotes from leftists and then a one sentence quote from someone like me. Then they pat themselves on the back and say “I presented both sides!”

Now, this Mary is in the Editorial department so that is different. Making absurd claims is probably how she got hired by the Sun-Times editorial department in the first place.

By: RobRoySimmons

RobRoySimmons — Fri, 15 Jun 2012 18:15:00 +0000

Hers is misdirection, if the simplest most basic questions were asked of the Chicago “elite” their whole story and facade of moral superiority would collapse.

By: truthbetold

truthbetold — Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:54:00 +0000

I suppose it’s irrelevant that Mary Mitchell is of African ancestry? Mainstream media somehow have to hire African American or Hispanic personnel and the news outlets promptly go left wing and antiwhite.

By: Earl P. Holt III

Earl P. Holt III — Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:45:00 +0000

I just wonder how subscribers to the SUN-TIMES will react to this editorial policy of theirs, especially with all the recent violence and savagery committed against innocent white Chicagoans by Africanus Criminalis…